Skip to main content

The Bubble Defense -- Writer's Poke #303



Do Americans find violence glamorous? Are we a violent society?


In “Aggression: The Impact of Media Violence,” Sissela Bok concludes that it’s too simplistic to blame any single cause for the increased level of violence being perpetuated in contemporary American society. It would be far too simple to blame television. Just because MacGyver shows how to make a “cold capsule bomb,” for example, doesn’t mean that everyone who watches is then going to immediately go out and make cold capsule bombs by the millions.

On the other hand, Bok does seem to suggest that kids are not fully mature, and therefore, they haven’t learned to “resist” their more aggressive basic instincts. She indicates that it should be a child’s “birthright” to be protected. Protected from what? Not images of violence, per se, but protected from his or her own immature reaction to violence. It’s a subtle difference, but Bok indicates that media, specifically TV, “affect this learning process from infancy on, in many homes.”

A fully-mature adult may be able to handle watching Natural Born Killers, but it may be too much for the average 12 year old to handle. Natural Born Killers, however, may be the extreme example. So it leads us back to a much more fundamental question: How do we best protect children from the bombardment of violent images that threaten to damage their ability to mature into peaceful, non-violent adults?

Should children be kept in protective “bubbles” for their own good? Or, is there a way to inoculate children to the violent images to which they will inevitably be exposed?

“You have to show violence the way it is. If you don’t show it realistically, then that’s immoral and harmful. If you don’t upset people, then that’s obscenity.” – Roman Polanski

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Summer Day Trip #1: Caledonia, Minnesota

The Wired Rooster Coffee Shoppe -- Caledonia, Minnesota


I've lived in Minnesota for over ten years, sure, but that doesn't mean I've actually seen much of the state. Like most people, I know what I know, and I go where I go. And that's the extent of it. But once I resigned myself to the fact that I wasn't going to make it to Alaska this summer, it occurred to me that I had plenty of sites to explore in the immediate region.

First stop: Caledonia, Minnesota. Where's that? It's a small town in the southeast corner of the state. Before I opened my Rand McNally Road Atlas, I had never heard of it, and before I punched the town name into Trip Advisor, I didn't know if there was anything there worth visiting.

Distance from home: About 75 miles.

Challenge #1: Leaving by 6:30 a.m.

Challenge #2: Taking my dog, Atticus.

Actually, Atticus is a good dog on a road trip, but the forecast indicated that it was going to get into the 90s. I wanted to leave early in the …